Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Porosity Prediction in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Critical Mechanical Components

Authors

  • Thomas K. Tirado Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
  • Charlene R. Williams Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
  • Sheila J. Burditt Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
  • Andrea J. Walters Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32996/bjps.2026.4.1.1

Keywords:

laser powder bed fusion; porosity prediction; physics-informed machine learning; critical mechanical components; in-situ monitoring; additive manufacturing

Abstract

Porosity remains one of the most consequential defects in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) because even small internal voids can degrade fatigue resistance, fracture performance, leak-tightness, and long-term reliability in safety-critical mechanical components. Purely empirical machine-learning models have shown promise for defect detection, yet they often depend heavily on machine-specific datasets and can lose interpretability outside the training domain. This manuscript develops a physics-informed machine-learning (PIML) framework for porosity prediction in LPBF by integrating process parameters, in-situ monitoring signals, and physically meaningful descriptors such as line energy, volumetric energy density, scan-overlap ratio, Peclet number, cooling-rate proxy, and mechanism-sensitive indicators for lack-of-fusion and keyhole instability. A hybrid learning objective is formulated to combine statistical prediction accuracy with soft physics penalties that discourage mechanistically inconsistent outputs. The paper further proposes a risk-based decision logic suitable for critical-component qualification, where predicted porosity must be interpreted together with uncertainty, part zoning, and inspection requirements. An analytical demonstration is included to show how the framework distinguishes stable, lack-of-fusion-prone, and keyhole-prone process windows. The contribution of the study is therefore methodological: it offers a publication-ready formulation that connects LPBF process physics, monitoring, and machine learning in a single, interpretable workflow that can later be validated with computed tomography, metallography, and mechanical testing data.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-03

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Thomas K. Tirado, Charlene R. Williams, Sheila J. Burditt, & Andrea J. Walters. (2026). Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Porosity Prediction in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Critical Mechanical Components. British Journal of Physics Studies, 4(1), 01-13. https://doi.org/10.32996/bjps.2026.4.1.1